CO129-278 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1897 [11-12] — Page 423

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

*

419

A

Since therefore the case of the Petitioner (and of various others) could not in the interests of the Public Service be brought before the Magistrate, they were dealt with under section 24 of Ord. 14 of 1837 in the same manner (with one exception) that many cases of a criminal nature in which the evidence is not strong enough to prosecute before a Magistrate with any hope of success, are dealt with by the Captain Supt. of Police,

Alles? Efe may wh

The exception I refer to is that in the Petitioner's Case (and in the others of a similar nature) the Crown Solicitor was associated with the Captain Supt. of Police not for the purpose of giving the latter legal assistance - for the enquiry was a very short & simple one & presented no legal difficulties whatever but to see that the enquiry was conducted with fairness to the accused.

I would further point out that the Petitioner seems to have lost sight of the fact that His Excellency the Governor and not the Captain Supt. of Police was his judge in this case. I presume the impartiality of the Governor is not called into question, and all that the Captain Supt. of Police did was to enquire into certain matters which had come to his knowledge & which seemed to indicate neglect of duty from corrupt motives on the part of the Petitioner, and to report thereon to His Excellency.

It

Edit History

2026-05-30 05:49:37 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
* 419 A Since therefore the case of the Petitioner (and of various others) could not in the interests of the Public Service be brought before the Magistrate, they were dealt with under section 24 of Ord. 14 of 1837 in the same manner (with one exception) that many cases of a criminal nature in which the evidence is not strong enough to prosecute before a Magistrate with any hope of success, are dealt with by the Captain Supt. of Police, Alles? Efe may wh The exception I refer to is that in the Petitioner's Case (and in the others of a similar nature) the Crown Solicitor was associated with the Captain Supt. of Police not for the purpose of giving the latter legal assistance - for the enquiry was a very short & simple one & presented no legal difficulties whatever but to see that the enquiry was conducted with fairness to the accused. I would further point out that the Petitioner seems to have lost sight of the fact that His Excellency the Governor and not the Captain Supt. of Police was his judge in this case. I presume the impartiality of the Governor is not called into question, and all that the Captain Supt. of Police did was to enquire into certain matters which had come to his knowledge & which seemed to indicate neglect of duty from corrupt motives on the part of the Petitioner, and to report thereon to His Excellency. It
Baseline (Original)
* 419 A Since therefore the case of the Petitioner (and of various others) coule not in the interests of the Public Service be brought before the Magistrate, they were dealt with under section 24 of Ord. 14 of 1837 in the sale manner (with one exception) that many cases of a criminal nature in which the evidence is not strong enough to prose- cute before a Magistrate with any hope of success, are dealt with by the Captain Supt. of Police, Alles? Efe may wh The exception I refer to is that in the Peti· tioner's Case (and in the others of a similar nature) the Crown Solicitor was associated with the Captain Supt.of Police not for the purpose of giving the latter legal as- sistance - for the enquiry was a very short & simple one & presented no legal difficulties whatever but to see that the enquiry was conducted with fairness to the accused. - I would further point out that the Petition- er seems to have lost sight of the fact that His Excellency the Governor anu not the Captain Supt. of Police was his juage in this case. I presume the impartiality of the Go- vernor is not called into question, and all that the Captain Supt. of Police did was to enquire into certain matters which has come to his knowledge & which seemed to indicate neglect of duty from corrupt motives on the part of the Petitioner, and to report thereon to His Excellency. It
2026-05-30 05:49:37 · Baseline
View content

*

419

A

Since therefore the case of the Petitioner

(and of various others) coule not in the interests of the

Public Service be brought before the Magistrate, they were

dealt with under section 24 of Ord. 14 of 1837 in the sale

manner (with one exception) that many cases of a criminal

nature in which the evidence is not strong enough to prose-

cute before a Magistrate with any hope of success, are dealt

with by the Captain Supt. of Police,

Alles?

Efe may

wh

The exception I refer to is that in the Peti·

tioner's Case (and in the others of a similar nature) the

Crown Solicitor was associated with the Captain Supt.of

Police not for the purpose of giving the latter legal as-

sistance - for the enquiry was a very short & simple one &

presented no legal difficulties whatever but to see that

the enquiry was conducted with fairness to the accused.

-

I would further point out that the Petition-

er seems to have lost sight of the fact that His Excellency

the Governor anu not the Captain Supt. of Police was his

juage in this case. I presume the impartiality of the Go-

vernor is not called into question, and all that the Captain

Supt. of Police did was to enquire into certain matters

which has come to his knowledge & which seemed to indicate

neglect of duty from corrupt motives on the part of the

Petitioner, and to report thereon to His Excellency.

It

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.